top of page
Data Server Room
CASE STUDY

Database Management Platform

A desktop and mobile experience designed to help teams monitor, diagnose, and stabilize high‑risk data systems with confidence.

Screenshot 2026-02-02 at 11.20.57 PM.png
Screenshot 2026-02-02 at 11.24.16 PM.png
Final_Product2_edited_edited.jpg
Untitled.png

Context & Scope

TEAM

2 Designer, 7 Engineers

MY ROLE

Senior Product Designer

TIMELINE

3 Months
(2022)

TOOLS

Figma, Jira, Miro

The Problem

Operational teams struggled to assess risk and act safely during incidents. Poor visibility, limited context, and mixed‑risk controls increased time to resolution and raised the likelihood of production errors—especially in on‑call and mobile scenarios.

My Contribution

I led the end‑to‑end UX across desktop and mobile—defining Jobs To Be Done, shaping incident‑response workflows, and setting clear safety boundaries. I partnered closely with product, engineering, and operations to align design decisions with real operational risk.

Overview

This platform supports mission‑critical database systems where availability, performance, and correctness are non‑negotiable. Administrators operate under time pressure, often during incidents with direct business impact.

THE OUTCOME

A role‑aware admin experience that delivered measurable improvements

-33%

Incidence response time

-22%

Reduction in high level escalations

Discovery & Research

We studied how teams behave during real incidents, focusing on decision-making rather than feature usage. What is their actual environment and real world conditions

8

STAKEHOLDER
INTERVIEWS

3

SITE
VISITS

2 Weeks

VIRTUAL
RIDEALONGS

The Environment

Production Pressure

Mission‑critical systems with strict uptime expectations. Incidents often occurred during on‑call hours, with limited time to assess risk and act safely.

Fragmented Tooling

Admins relied on multiple dashboards, logs, and monitoring tools to understand a single issue, slowing diagnosis and resolution.

Limited Mobility

Mobile access was restricted to basic alerts, forcing admins to either wait for desktop access or act without sufficient context.

Research Insights

1

Monitoring lacked visual signal, Admins had to mentally interpret numbers instead of immediately recognizing risk.

2

The platform exposed data, but not status. Admins could see memory, CPU, or ingestion metrics, but not whether the system was healthy, degraded, or at risk.

3

Metrics, logs, and alerts lived in isolation. Admins manually stitched together information across screens to understand cause and effect.

4

With few visual hints or recommendations, resolving issues depended heavily on senior admins’ prior knowledge rather than system support.

THE STRATEGY

Make risk visible. Make action safe.

Our focus was simple: help admins understand what state the system is in, what matters right now, and what they can safely do next—especially under pressure. Instead of adding more controls, I designed the experience to reduce uncertainty and support better judgment.

1

Make system health obvious.

2

Keep mobile for stabilizing, desktop for fixing

3

Recommend actions, but keep admins in control.

User Persona

Based on the research and synthesis we came up with a DBA persona.

The new database workflow

Fix Database Issues Without Leaving the Alert

01

Alerts

Alerts arrive with severity, impact, and cause summarized upfront, eliminating guesswork and false urgency.

02

Review Inline

Critical metrics, recent changes, and related events are visible inline, allowing confident assessment without leaving the alert.

03

Act & Stabilise

Common recovery actions are completed directly from the alert, reducing response time and preventing escalation.

THE NEW DESKTOP EXPERIENCE

See more. Act faster.
Manage data with confidence.

MOBILE EXPERIENCE

Designed for quick checks and fast action.

Experience the Mobile workflow

Static screens can only tell half the story. We built high-fidelity prototypes to test the physics of our flow & interactions.

Validation & Testing

Before rollout, we ran 2 rounds of moderated usability testing with DBAs and on-call engineers using realistic incident scenarios (memory pressure, ingestion failure, degraded performance).

The goal was to validate comprehension, decision-making, and confidence — not speed or efficiency alone.

Task Completion (With Confidence)

Jumped from 6/10 to 9/10

Backtracking / Screen Switching

Reduced from 4–5 screens → 2–3 screens per task

Testing Feedback

“I don’t have to figure out whether this is serious anymore. The screen tells me that before I even start looking around.”

T

DBA, USABILITY TESTING

"Earlier I kept checking other views to make sure I wasn’t missing something. Here I feel comfortable choosing an action and moving on."

S

Senior DBA, moderated testing

The Impact

-33%

RESPONSE TIME

-22%

HIGH LEVEL ESCALATIONS

01

INTEGRATED APP FOR ALL DBA NEEDS

DBA, ON_CALL ROTATION

"

In production, I can tell within a few seconds whether the system is at risk and what I should do next. Earlier, I had to open multiple dashboards before feeling confident.”

What I Learned

System state beats raw data

Admins don’t lack metrics—they lack clarity. Clear health states help them understand risk instantly without mental math.

Mobile builds confidence

On mobile, admins want to orient themselves and act safely. Full control belongs on desktop, not in urgent contexts.

Safety is part of UX

Guardrails and confirmations actively prevent mistakes and increase trust during high‑risk, high‑pressure moments.

Guidance scales teams

When actions explain why they’re recommended, teams rely less on tribal knowledge and senior escalation.

UX Design can potentially changes behavior

Reducing noise and ambiguity leads to steadier decisions and more predictable operations under pressure.

bottom of page